Emiliana Arango vs Carson Branstine Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Arango vs C. Branstine

COL
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CAN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Arango 1 - 0 Branstine
They have played 2 sets in total, with Emiliana Arango winning 2 and Carson Branstine winning 0. The last match between Emiliana Arango and Carson Branstine was at the Cancun Tennis Open - Cancun, 15-02-2025, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with Emiliana Arango getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Arango | 1 |
| Branstine | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(F) Cancun Tennis Open - Cancun(02-15-25)
E. Arango vs C. Branstine H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $580,444 | Career Prize Money | $112,624 |
| 56.22% (244-190) | Career Total W/L | 64.32% (146-81) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 7 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 46.15% (12-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 40.00% (2-3) |
E. Arango vs C. Branstine Match Preview:
Predicting the Outcome of the Upcoming Tennis Match
Insights on Second Serve Performance: Evaluating their recent form over the last six months, it is observed that Branstine has exhibited impressive prowess in winning 46.81% of points on their second serve. On the other hand, Arango has achieved a commendable 39.22% success rate. This statistic holds significant value as it exhibits a strong correlation with match prediction accuracy.
Analyzing Return Game Stats: Considering the recent form, Branstine has showcased exceptional skills by winning 54.64% of their opponents' second serve points. Arango, too, has accomplished a commendable 60.38% success rate in this regard. For first serve returns, Branstine maintains a 39.48% success rate, whereas Arango boasts a slightly higher rate of 41.98%. These statistics play a pivotal role in determining the favorability of each player in the head-to-head (H2H) match-up.
Under Pressure Analysis: In terms of saving breakpoints, Branstine has impressively saved 51.12% of such instances during their recent performances. Comparatively, Arango has exhibited a slightly lower but still noteworthy rate of 48.46%. This statistic serves as a valuable tool for predicting outcomes in in-game betting scenarios.
Performance Overview: Evaluating their performance over the past year, Branstine has emerged victorious in 67.35% of matches played, boasting an impressive win-loss record of 33-16. On the contrary, Arango has achieved a relatively lower success rate, winning 46.67% of matches with a win-loss record of 28-32. These figures provide an overall prediction overview for their head-to-head encounters.
Analyzing the Best Surface for Each Player: Branstine has exhibited her strongest career surface performance on Hard courts, with an impressive 70% win rate (80-34). However, her performance on I.hard courts has been relatively weaker, with a modest 20% win rate (2-8). Conversely, Arango thrives on Clay courts, where she boasts a remarkable win rate of 60% (134-90). However, her performance on I.hard courts has been comparatively lower, with a 46% win rate (6-7).
Player Level Evaluation: Analyzing the players' competition levels over the past year, it is evident that Branstine has primarily participated in Challengers/ITF tournaments worth more than $10K. During these tournaments, she has achieved an impressive 68.75% win rate (33-15). Arango, too, has actively competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments above the $10K mark, winning 58.82% of matches (20-14). Comparing the statistics between the players is significant in predicting the favorite; it is crucial to consider the relevance of the level of competition at which they have been playing.
Evaluating Opponent Quality Stats: Over the past 12 months, Branstine has faced opponents with an average rank of 318.61, indicating that she has confronted formidable adversaries. Arango, on the other hand, has encountered players with an average rank of 182.03, showcasing her competitiveness against relatively higher-ranked opponents.
Deciding Set Performance: Delving into the players' performance in deciding sets, Branstine has proven her mettle by winning 63% of such sets over the past year. In comparison, Arango has attained a respectable 52% success rate in all matches played on tour. These statistics are crucial for live predictions and betting enthusiasts.
Current Event Head-to-Head (H2H) Stats: While past player performance may offer valuable insights in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to consider the current event stats to gauge the players' current form. To access the section below, which provides precise information on their performance in the ongoing event, will provide relevant indications. Additionally, it is worth considering that certain players exhibit better performances at specific events, which should be taken into account when making outcome predictions.
Break Point Conversion: In recent times, Branstine has showcased an impressive ability to convert 48.37% of breakpoint opportunities. Arango, too, has a remarkable conversion rate of 51.13% when presented with chances to break her opponents' serve. This statistic serves as a compelling factor for in-game live betting tips, particularly when the players face breakpoint opportunities.
If you are intrigued by models predicting tennis match outcomes, you may find this article insightful (Warning: Suitable for avid statisticians).
Emiliana Arango vs Carson Branstine Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Arango vs C. Branstine H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:30:47 | Average Match Time | 1:30:47 |
| 71% (25/35) | 1st Serve % | 59% (45/76) |
| 56% (14/25) | 1st Serve Win % | 40% (18/45) |
| 60% (6/10) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (10/31) |
| 47% (8/17) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (3/3) |
| 63% (48/76) | Return Points Win % | 43% (15/35) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Arango Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-7(3) 6-1 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-2 2-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 7-5 | ||
C. Branstine Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rubber 1 | W | 6-3 7-6(5) | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(0) 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(2) 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 6-4 | ||

E. Arango vs C. Branstine Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.22% (244/190) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.32% (146/81) |
| 55.02% (537/439) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.66% (320/199) |
| 52.74% (4646/4163) | Games Win/Loss | 54.78% (2585/2134) |
| 55.42% (92/74) | Hard Win/Loss | 68.75% (88/40) |
| 58.72% (138/97) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.16% (46/28) |
| 46.15% (6/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37.50% (6/10) |
| 40.00% (8/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 66.67% (6/3) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 399 | Aces Total | 492 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 1205 | Total Double Faults | 760 |
| 1:27:36 | Average Match Time | 1:29:14 |
| 411.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 447.53 |
| 67% (16620/24974) | 1st Serve % | 61% (8371/13813) |
| 59% (9798/16620) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (5408/8371) |
| 44% (3700/8354) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2482/5442) |
| 48% (1658/3480) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (856/1708) |
| 47% (12179/25786) | Return Points Win % | 46% (6297/13560) |
| 27.78% (5/13) | Slam W/L | 57.14% (4/3) |
| 51.61% (16/15) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/6) |
| 52.94% (9/8) | Cups W/L | 100.00% (1/0) |
| 44.07% (26/33) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 59.16% (155/107) | Challenger W/L | 64.05% (98/55) |
| 70.21% (33/14) | Futures W/L | 74.07% (40/14) |
| 57% (238/421) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (145/225) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 47% (34/73) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (29/56) |
| 54% (63/116) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (37/65) |
| 88% (239/211) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (144/130) |
| 11% (239/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (144/14) |
| 16% (195/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (83/16) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Luisina Giovannini vs Leolia Jeanjean Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 25th November 2025 Best Bets

Oleksandra Oliynykova vs Sada Nahimana Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 25th November 2025 Best Bets

Juan Manuel Cerundolo vs Antoine Ghibaudo Prediction – ATP Temuco Challenger – 25th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Julia Riera Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 25th November 2025 Best Bets

James Duckworth vs Filip Peliwo Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 25th November 2025 Best Bets
